HP ScanJet 4670 See-Thru Vertical Scanner
- ASIN: B0000C9ZJT
- List Price: $215.99
Product Description:
With the utterly unique HP Scanjet 4670 See-Thru Vertical Scanner, you'll see what you're scanning and preview scans quickly -- in as little as six seconds. Its ultra-thin design allows the scanner to sit vertically in its easel, saving you desk space! Image Scaling & Enlargement - 10 to 2000% Hi-Speed USB interface (cable included) OS Compatibility - Windows 98 > XP (no NT), Mac OS 9.1+ File Formats - BMP, TIFF, GIF, PDF, HTML, JPEG, FPX, TIFF, PCX, RTF, TXT & PNG Dimensions - 0.7H x 16.3W x 11.8D; weighs 3.04 pounds One year limited warranty
Product Details
- Feature:
- Vertical see-through digital flat-bed scanner
- 2,400 x 2,400 dpi maximum optical resolution
- 48-bit color depth, 256 gray levels
- Included transparent materials adapter
- USB interface, PC and Mac compatible
- Binding: Electronics
- Brand: Hewlett-Packard
- EAN: 0008736565923
- FormFactor: Desktop
- HardwarePlatform: PC
- IsAutographed: 0
- IsMemorabilia: 0
- Label: Hewlett Packard
- Manufacturer: Hewlett Packard
- MediaType: Transparencies
- Model: Q3122A#A2L
- MPN: Q3122A#A2L
- PackageQuantity: 1
- ProductGroup: CE
- ProductTypeName: SCANNER
- Publisher: Hewlett Packard
- ReleaseDate: 2003-11-02
- Studio: Hewlett Packard
- UPC: 008736565923
- Warranty: 1 year warranty

Accessories
Customer Reviews 

Very Good Scanner
2008-01-03I've owned the HP 4670 for nearly 3 years and have very few complaints. I don't understand the bad reviews about banding. I've never had anything like that. I work on a iMac G5, do lots of photo work. Only fault I can find is that when the scanner is in the vertical position and I try to set 2 or 3 photos to scan, they tend to slide sideways when I shut the cover. I do find this annoying. Also, it's rather slow to warm up to the first scan. But overall, I think it's a very good scanner and I wouldn't replace it unless something outstandingly better came along.

Not Vista Compatible
2007-09-09I was completely satisfied with this scanner. The only problem I had was a software glitch when I upgraded to Explorer 7.0, but that has since been fixed. Unfortunately, as with most of the peripheral equipment I had, it does not support Vista. There is a driver, but it only works with Windows Photo Gallery, which is bundled with the Vista OS and has very few features. The HP software is not compatible. But at least it works... When I upgraded to a new computer that came with Vista, I had to buy a new laser printer to replace the Xerox I've used for years as well as a later model DYMO label maker. My Canon PIXIMA iP6000D is the only equipment that had an upgrade. All the manufacturers who do not support Vista do have a solution to the problem: Purchase their latest product. I wonder if Microsoft gets a kickback?

Great idea...iffy software
2007-08-15Like many reviewers here I had a dead one of these things. HP replaced it without a quibble though and the replacement has been just excellent. I do like the machine itself, though I have to say that the HP bloatware scanner software is really very unpleasant. I just use the basic WIA driver, which does everything I need.
For scanning large documents, which is what I do a lot, there is nothing better.

Good for the money
2007-01-10Pretty good for the money. If you are really picky about quality you should get a more professional model - this is economy grade. The versatility of this scanner is awesome since it can be taken off the base and used to scan large items. I also like that it takes up minimal desk space when stored on its base. That was the main selling point for me.

Works great!!
2006-05-17I'm a network administrator (among other things!!) and my boss decided to buy this scanner for my department. I do a LOT of scanning and I don't have any complaints about this scanner. We've had it for about a year without any problems. It's true it takes a while doing the first scan, because it has to "warm up the lamp", but after that it's very fast. It comes with some bundled software you can use to scan several parts of a large image and then put them together like a puzzle, but to be honest I rather use photoshop to do that job, and I get great results!!
However, I'm giving it 4 stars because I think it doesn't scan negatives as good as it should; for documents it's excellent!!
Electronics Articles 
Camera basics: shutter-speed, aperture and ISO
In this article, I’ll introduce you to the basic elements that you can use to control exposure in your shooting. If you have a digital SLR, there will be a way to set all of these controls on your camera, but since they differ between manufacturers and models, you’ll need to refer to your camera’s manual to find out exactly how to change them.
All cameras, whether an ancient film camera, or a more modern digital, work in pretty much the same way. Photographs are taken by letting light fall onto a light-sensitive medium, which records the image. Traditionally, this has been film, but more recently, it tends to be a digital sensor. The more light that falls onto the film or sensor, the lighter the image.
Put simply, a camera consists of a light-tight box that stores a light-sensitive device (either a film or a digital sensor), a lens that magnifies and focuses the image onto that light-sensitive device through a hole in the box (called the aperture) , and a shutter that opens ...
Driving with a cell phone is a lot less dangerous than driving on prescription drugs
There's a lot of debate today about the safety of using cell phones while driving. Statistics show that those who use cell phones while driving cause a much greater percentage of accidents than those who avoid using their cell phones. And the studies have shown that it's not just the physical coordination required to punch numbers into the cell phone while you're trying to work the vehicle that causes accidents; it's actually the lack of attention resulting from driving and talking on the cell phone at the same time. It seems that when you're distracted, you're more likely to cause accidents.
In terms of public safety, it's probably correct to say that banning cell phones would reduce the number of traffic accidents. But I think, more accurately, it depends on the person. Some people are operating on, shall we say, lower power CPUs in their heads to begin with. They might be zoned out on prescription drugs, and when you add a cell phone to the equation, they do become a danger to the ...