DF-383 Power Zoom AF Flash for Nikon

DF-383 Power Zoom AF Flash for Nikon

 
Larger image or other views
 

Bookmark
Product Description:

The DF-383 digital power zoom flash gun is innovatively designed for both digital cameras and film cameras with features that are leading photography into the digital era. Advanced technology is used in your flash to control the correct amount of light output. Compatible with Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Pentax or Sony/Minolta cameras (Nikon model pictured).
Product Details
  • Feature:
  • Red Eye Reduction ♦ Autofocus/TTL Metering
  • Auto Zoom and Manual Zoom Flash Head from 24/28/35/50/70/85mm ♦ DSLR Autofocus
  • Assist Focus Beam in Low Light Conditions ♦ Illuminated LCD Display
  • Guide Number 45m at 85mm Position ♦ Built-in Reflecting Plate and Diffuser
  • Swivel Bounce Zoom Head -- Horizontal Swivel Angle: 0°- 270° -- Vertical Bounce Angle: 0°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°
  • Binding: Electronics
  • Brand: Vivitar
  • EAN: 0681066561317
  • IsAutographed: 0
  • IsMemorabilia: 0
  • Label: Vivitar
  • Manufacturer: Vivitar
  • Model: VIV-DF-383-CAN
  • MPN: VIV-DF-383-NIK
  • PackageQuantity: 1
  • ProductGroup: Photography
  • ProductTypeName: CAMERA_FLASH
  • ProductTypeSubcategory: shoe-mount
  • Publisher: Vivitar
  • Studio: Vivitar
  • UPC: 681066561317

Customers who bought this item also bought

Customer Reviews

The Old Standard in Flash is back2010-03-16
I purchased the DF-383-NIK for the Nikon system. I was hesitated as others had comments regarding built quality and out of the box performance mostly DOA units. I can't comment on that as the unit we received has performed perfectly. The TTL and fill flash work as a Vivitar should. I've used Vivitar Flash units for 20 years and they are robust.
Power zoom is abit louder than expected and the internal light is of little value in most cases as its lit only from one side of the LCD screen, unit goes to sleep by itself requiring reset. But other than that it works as advertise. TTL metering. Works as a slave (S-switch on the rear) and can be triggered. Its a big unit and after using it for 2 separate jobs I can rate it a solid 4 Stars. Minus (-1) one as it not built as well as the old Vivitar's or anywhere near as solid as Nikon SL SB's units (which I have 600/800). Battery access door is cheaply made, Oh yea order some rechargeable AA batteries,I use Energizers 2,450's and Sanyo's.

Excellent value for photographers using there 1st ext flash and pro's alike.
Used on a D90/300 and D700 bodies for reference.
Vivitar flashes2010-02-01
THose lights are very good, are TTL compatible, can be trigger via a Flash slave, have manual setting, can be used with the cactus wireless trigger. The only thing is that after a while, does not matter if you are using it continously, it goes off (standby), you have to reset it manually. I do not like that feature.
Vivitar DF383 Flash for Canon / Nikon2010-01-25
Ordered TWO of these flash units ~ both failed straight away out of the box. Construction is sub-par compared to units directly from Nikon or Canon. While the flash unit is as powerful and has the same features, both units had failure in the zoom unit (head unit). In one, the head fell off the internal track after a couple of shots, and got stuck in the wide angle position. In the other unit, the flash would not communicate properly with the camera after the first shot. THANK GOODNESS for Amazon ~ and Adorama Cameras ~ as I was able to exchange these units for name branded units. I ended up getting two Nikon SB-600 flash units in exchange. Money was more, but, definitely worth it, as one flash resides on my camera, and the second unit is the slave for backlighting.

Save yourself a lot of grief, and get the OEM units instead.
Does Not work well2010-01-10
This flash unit does not work well with my nikon D90 and does not work at all with my D40. So I had to buy a nikon SB600 to replace it. Old proverb 'cheap ting nogood, good ting nocheap' Garnet Richardson does not like junk equipment
Very Pleased2009-11-15
I am quite pleased with this flash. Integrates well with my Nikon D90. It does not function with Nikon's Creative Lighting System, but then it costs 1/4 the price of a NIKON SB-900. Plenty of power to bounce off walls and ceilings or use with a additional diffuser. The quality of your photos will improve significantly with almost any flash other than the small direct flash built into your camera. The manual and/or slave capabilities will allow off camera flash shots that will further improve your photography. That said, the slave funtion does not work well in outdoor situations where the ambient lighting is high. This is were the much more expensive NIKON SB series flash units will out perform this flash unit - remote wireless TTL flash control - I just can't understand why a flash unit SB-900) should cost more than half the cost of my D90 body. The D90 has significantly more electronic and mechanical technology than the SB900 and I'm sure the mfg'ing cost of the D90 is many times that of the SB900.

Electronics Articles

Printer Buying Guide
What kind of printer is best for me? Choosing the right printer can be a daunting task. There are several different types of printing technology to choose from, each suited for different needs. Printers come in all shapes and sizes, from tiny travel companions to workgroup workhorses; some are geared toward photographers, others are for multitaskers. And the many specifications for resolution and speed can be misleading. As a rule of thumb, inkjet printers are a must for long-lasting photos, while laser printers are best to produce speedy text documents. User types: Home user | Budding novelist | Digital photographer | Entrepreneur | Corporate cog | Frequent flier Home user  The home user demands a lot from a printer. The device must tackle everything from a book report to a newsletter to the occasional snapshot--all without breaking the budget. This is why for most home users, the best choice is a versatile and affordable printer, such as a small-office/home-office color ...
Driving with a cell phone is a lot less dangerous than driving on prescription drugs
There's a lot of debate today about the safety of using cell phones while driving. Statistics show that those who use cell phones while driving cause a much greater percentage of accidents than those who avoid using their cell phones. And the studies have shown that it's not just the physical coordination required to punch numbers into the cell phone while you're trying to work the vehicle that causes accidents; it's actually the lack of attention resulting from driving and talking on the cell phone at the same time. It seems that when you're distracted, you're more likely to cause accidents. In terms of public safety, it's probably correct to say that banning cell phones would reduce the number of traffic accidents. But I think, more accurately, it depends on the person. Some people are operating on, shall we say, lower power CPUs in their heads to begin with. They might be zoned out on prescription drugs, and when you add a cell phone to the equation, they do become a danger to the ...